At the end of term, here is that Sen. Bosi intends the press (The national newspaper, Il Resto del Carlino, La Nazione. Day), Saturday, December 24, 2005, with an article entitled quotes: "housing are scarce. Take precedence over the military poor "- Sen. Bosi emerges to address an issue familiar to him, that of evictions that is yet always with an attitude that wants to be" law and order "but not having much familiarity of the problem, at least does everything to prove it, can only exacerbate the families of people without giving any fee to resolve the shortage of housing for Defence.
He has the delegates to the evictions, but if the word is a bit "retro" we call delegation recoveries coattti (Unicuique suum).
CASADIRITTO But why he still does to what the Secretary said?
Why CASADIRITTO confident in reasoning, trying to understand the causes than effects.
Certainly, compared to previous statements there is good literature.
Wednesday, April 2, 2003 , Sen. Bosi thundered the newspaper La Nazione:
- "sfratterò irregular soldiers. Gone are the days of privilege. "
November 28, 2004: a kilometer (2 pages thick) taken ADNKRONOS Agency, declared that not to use force to free public housing, was born the need to securitize housing.
phrase remained mysterious and incomprehensible to most.
then explained the deal, continued:
"The Defense, 4000 in exchange for housing, will receive 20 million euros."
You've understood: the 40 billion lire (worth about 100 apartments) in exchange for a total estimated at 1,000 billion old lire.
The Secretary seemed that a deal has also written, to us, we know that arithmetic looked like a seizure but not all tastes are equal.
Monday, November 29, 2004: looked back alive from the columns of "The Time" with a number of goodies, with regard to cartolarizzandi or not they could buy, he said:
"It is certainly not to the Ministry to make such assessments " in stark contrast c q2uanto expressed by the Commission on Defense Act in the House with No 426/novembre 2004, in the opinion of the Decree on the securitization, where it was confirmed by a formal act, the need to determine who among the cartolarizzandi had the opportunity to buy or not.
Details. According to the Secretary, not The Ministry (but then who?).
And in fact deliver on the Court of Auditors has rejected the decree, this being one of the reasons given. We who are malicious, we think the rejection of the concerns, at least as stated.
Another gem: the Secretary, not very informed of the law, while continuing to inform Italy that the "sine titulo" were people (sic) are not entitled to remain where they are, his colleague Mr Cicu, also Secretary of Defense, along with others, such as CHALLENGING Sen, President of the Senate Defence Commission and the rapporteur Zorzoli Sen (oer both remain under government area) in the session Senate September 29, 2004 along with other passed a resolution where it was held, inter alia:
"to consider the possibility of maintaining the process of selling forced the families of people who are in difficult conditions and can not adhere to the terms of sale proposals ..........."
During the same pulse sen. ZORZOLI (Rapporteur) said that the "Sine titulo," him the title two times.
- the first because they are inside the housing in compliance with the law (537 and 724):
- the second because the defense could preserve and maintain their homes with the funds derived from royalties.
Secretary CICU, obviously someone who knows the laws, agrees, being present at the meeting.
Explain Secretary Senator, because she does not agree with his colleague, Secretary. On CICU?
And yet (pore Secretary Mr Bosi ):
In During the immediate response to a question to the Minister of Defense, the n.5- 04,721 in September 2005, concerning a military reached an order of enforcement of debts that had exceeded the income limit because its 2004 cud Mod reported the benefits of mission in Ira, news CASADIRITTO launched and taken up by all the national press, agencies and the major television networks), the Minister of Defense, Secretary of the mouth of CICU, he replied:
"As a BINDING OF RULES INTRODUCED BY LAW 326 DEL 2003 securitization involving the RINUNCIAS LARGE PART OF THE ASSETS OF HOUSING AND VIEW OF THOUSANDS OF REQUESTS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO HOUSING, PENDANT MADE FROM MILITARY SERVICE IN THE DEFENSE AND 'REQUIRED, BOTH FROM THE POINT OF normatively C HE MORAL EQ2UITATIVO, TO GIVE THE COURSE OF UTILITIES forced recovery of the occupants who have lost TITLE "
So with much realism emphasized the cause-effect relationship between securitization and evictions.
But now, out at the end (of the European Parliament ...) reappears the disturbing Sen BOSI.
Sometimes back, or better returns,
From the columns of the newspaper chain with which I began, on Christmas Eve, CASADIRITTO is informed of a new "performance "that can not pass easily forgotten or relegated to eternity days in the archives of the hosts.
3Probabilmente Senator has not been well informed of the provisions in the mechanisms of securitization of revenue or something else CASADIRITTO not known, but one or the other case would not be justifiable for us.
It says "now, but everything is locked and in this manner does not have the funds (sales revenue) that would allow you to restart the system."
But how, you have not been informed?
not the Minister of Economy said that the money should not be the securitization of Defense? Unless, you feel satisfied by 20 million euros (40 billion will lire) scheduled for 2004 in exchange for value of 1000 billion lire.
Now that the wells have been poisoned, where it spread to both hands confusion arising from feared or hoped for sales, and spread terror with evictions to be carried out or completed, how can you make certain statements? What income you speak?
And finally: CASADIRITTO us because even people who have worked or are a specific task in the Defense, respectful of the institutions we thought and still think that a Secretary should be the institutions and only ones: She says, downloading or trying to assign blame to others, after 5 years commission: " not want to repeat the mistakes that have already cost us thousands of housing and, more generally, the management of patronage and certainly not very careful, that there is already before us."
We who? But you on behalf of the speaker?
She is the defense, I think, there are the "we" or "you".
If, outside the laws that protect what she calls illegal, but as you know they are not, for CASADIRITTO laws are good, there are clientele and Poor management, because in 5 years did not intervene?
What if the errors you by any chance think our laws (the 537 and 724) Please note that these laws allow:
- to give dignity to our families;
- to provide the Defense economic resources to try to maintain their housing stock through the payment of fees is also substantial;
- to provide resources for the mutual fund house, finally launched in August last, after CASADIRITTO, had placed a question: " how much and who manages the" Peso "accumulated since 1994, through fees paid by the" sine titulo "(cum titulo) and that she, with her attempts to thwart eviction?
Conversely you in five years, what has he done?
We would like to know. Take note of the failure of securitization. We seek the direct selling defense-Users and suspend evictions in useful, since you should not ignore the empty apartments: 2500.
The families of people needs a valid interlocutor, peaceful, which shows continuous muscle in these times of economic hardship.
You must change your attitude and the total will also include the arguments of others.
Rome, January 2006
Sergio Boncioli
National Coordinator CASADIRITTO
0 comments:
Post a Comment